It talks randomly, occasionally, and situationally. it's a blog, not a blog, but an account of the time.
Wednesday, September 15, 2021
The travelling of agricultural policies in India
Thalaivii : Film based on Jayalalitha
Monday, May 17, 2021
Days in SEWA Bharati. COVID Care Centre
Saturday, March 13, 2021
The girl who transforms herself for him
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
The February Lesson
The second week began in thought of taking a decision for the stuffs, after failure over failure, which had never been supposed. But, I think, these stuffs are the need of the hour to survive in the different societal structures. These stuffs have been blamed by many in the name of time, God, bad fortunes and unwanted destiny, but over the time these will be appreciated as I believe.
To engage with the people is a continuous process and society helps in regard. Initially, we are not able to distinguish the proper and inappropriate mind. In early age, one who is good for us, later, one becomes the worst. Many have encountered it for the sake of good.
As I conclude the month that with the time many who are connected for the benefits, automatically get off one’s niche. Secondly, if you raise sound for your rights, it is heard; and, thirdly, I realised the best line of the novel 'A Gentleman in Moscow' that if 'a man does not master his circumstances then he bound to be mastered by them' will not be forgotten. It was a social realisation that I got by the means of a formation of groups that will motivate me to be aware of making the new one.
In the fourth week as the month ended with my attendance in IIMCAA's Connection 2021. It was my first participation after the completion of the course from the IIMC. It was full of fun, curiosity, excitement and most importantly, a secret and sacred way of getting motivation by seniors, who have secured a reputable position in their career.
Many of them have started their first jobs with low stipend, but having got practical insight in the industry, they earn today such an amount that is enough to live. It indicates that when you should start your career and how much you should get for your work never matter; the thing matters that you have started to apply your institution-got knowledge according to your training and wish. Future is uncertain and one, who has already got a famed name, even does not know one will reach that fame. Overall, the Connection-2021 was a motivation for me and it will be for all!
These are all about the
February-2021.
Saturday, January 9, 2021
Book Review- 4: Who wants democracy?- Democracy as weapon of the weak
Book/Film Review- 4
Javeed Alam
Who Wants Democracy
Orient Blackswan, Rs- 325/-
Javeed Alam, an eminent professor, writes this book ‘Who Wants Democracy’ in 2004 under the series—Tracts for the Times—of publisher Orient Blackswan to examine the rapid changes, in the internal structure of Indian democracy.
Tracts for the
times attempts to provide a meaningful information, critical perspective, and
theoretical reflections on various themes written by eminent social scientists,
journalists, lawyers and social activists, that is edited by S. Gopal, Romila
Thapar and Neeladri Bhattacharya.
Freedom is a
covenant between the elite and the masses
The book starts
with the definition of modernity and later he theorizes the democratising
modernity. In his opinion, the inauguration of democracy in India was the
result of a covenant between the elite, the middle class and the
intelligentsia, on the one side and the ordinary people in their great
diversity, with all their problems, on the other.
He argues that initially,
the ordinary people had great power of mobilisation against exploitation, but
in a short period, they went backward from the Pabna and Deccan revolts to
Fakir-Sanyasi insurrections.
This notion is
extremely acclaimed in the centre-left intelligentsia and the liberal circle
but denied by the people who are not part of this club and appreciate the
Fakir-Sanyasi rebels as a revival of cultural nationalism.
Mandal Reward:
Benefiting Democracy
The implementation
of Mandal commission’s recommendation impacted the internal function and the
structure of Indian Democracy. Alam categorized these in several
points—‘leaders who occupy positions in democratic institutions are lack in
principles and prone to shift loyalty’ and ‘a sharp increase in social
disharmony’ and therefore caste conflicts became the bane of politics with
figures like Laloo Yadav, Mulayam Singh and Mayawati, are two of them.
He portrayed the
‘Public Confidence’ as a source of democracy and argues that Indian governments
have solved none of the problems- work, food, shelter, health etc, even after
the public have not lost confidence ever and always believe in democratic
processes and vote with enjoy to maintain the sustainability of Indian
Democracy because democracy is a weapon of the weak.
Making of Indian nation and role of civil
society
Explaining
the making of the Indian nation, Alam observes that the dominant secular
Nehruvian model is now threatened by the communal politics and regional
assertion. The monolithic conception of nation derived either from the secular
or from the Hindutva has been rejected by the linguistic cultural regions and
multiple ways being Indian is taking shape over a period of time.
The
elites who are educated and capable of exercising their rights constitute the
core members of the civil society and set the rule for the functioning of
democracy in India without the support of a very large part of the civil
society.
Despite of some weaknesses, the book is readable for understanding a different point of view on Indian Democracy. The rise of new middle class, role of civil society, the elite-masses relationship and a deep analysis of Hindutva are the themes of the book that Javeed Alam describes.
#1000booksreading
Thursday, January 7, 2021
Imagined Community- A guide to nationalism
Book/Film Review- 3
Imagined Community
By- Benedict Anderson
Rawat Publications, Rs- 799/.
‘Imagined Community’, a book on the origins and spread of nationalism; written by Benedict Anderson- a prominent professor of International Studies Emeritus at Cornell University, is a highly-researched-document in the field of International Relation literature.
This book is appreciated in scholastic manner and it finds its space on top among academicians, journalists and the students of world affairs to sort out the confusions on nationalism. The Guardian writes this book is ‘sparkling, readable, and densely packed.’ And, the Academic Library Book Review praises as a book to owned, and read, and re-read and treasured.
Imagined Community book cover (R. Suresh Bhardwaj Picture) |
Although I have been a student of political science, and enjoy a little
knowledge of international relations but I am not perfect guy to jot down the
review of this book because I carry no expertise of the subject and any research
experience in this field. I am writing this piece only to point out the
contents of this book.
The book unfolds the answer of the question ‘what makes people live and
die for nations, as well as hate and kill in their name?’ Benedict Anderson argues that the
nation is a new, modern phenomenon. The 17th and 18th century witnessed the
demise of previous forms of political bodies that were shaped by a sacred
language and dynastic power. It is through the emergence of
print-capitalism—the technological, mass production of newspapers and the novel
and the spread of vernacular print languages—that individuals could think of
themselves and relate to others in different ways.
His second contribution is the historical argument regarding the models
of nations and nationalisms. The earliest nations and nationalist movements
emerged in ‘creole communities’—descendants of white European settlers in the
North and South Americas.
The third of his contribution is official nationalism and imperialism,
seen in Russia, Japan, Thailand, England and Hungary. This form of nationalism
is a defensive, conservative response by monarchs to popular and linguistic
nationalists.
The fourth model of nationalism develops out of the colonial context and
institutions of education, bureaucracy, and movement in Asia and Africa by the
administrative, educated, bilingual intelligentsia.
Anderson conceptualizes many long-lasting terms like Russification, French Revolution as concept of revolution, Bolshevik revolutionary model, Nationalisms from the New World and Print-capitalism.
Partha Chatterjee as a main contender, who argues that print capitalism is a simplistic and linear argument and does not consider asymmetrical power relations of colonial context. The feminist criticises Anderson’s argument as a male phenomenon, understanding fraternity eliding gender, class and race. For more, readers should go through the book.
A good book on nationalism to read, but not for general reading!